Discordant rapid HIV tests: lessons from a low‐resource community
Open Access
- 31 July 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in HIV Medicine
- Vol. 19 (1), 72-76
- https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12541
Abstract
Objectives HIV rapid antibody tests are widely used in Africa, but dual testing sometimes produces discordant results. It is not clear if discordant rapid HIV tests should always heighten suspicion by frontline health workers that early HIV infection is present. Some studies have reported that discordant rapid tests have value for identifying early HIV infection in high HIV prevalence populations. It is not known if rapid test performance influenced this conclusion, or if this observation will hold true for low HIV prevalence populations. We therefore explored the occurrence of discordant rapid HIV tests in a low‐resource community. Methods A cross‐sectional sample of HIV status‐unaware adults with recent exposure to unsafe sex was assessed using a validated risk‐based tool (University of North Carolina (UNC)‐Malawi Risk Screening Score) for acute HIV infection. Participants received rapid testing with Determine™ HIV 1/2 and Uni‐Gold™ HIV assays, plus plasma HIV‐1 antigen testing with the COBAS® Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® HIV‐1 assay, followed by western blot in those with detected HIV‐1 antigen. Results Of 408 participants, 1.0% were confirmed to have established HIV infection. The discordance between rapid tests at initial screening was 2.45 and 2.94% when the two assays were used sequentially and simultaneously, respectively. Discordant rapid tests were strongly associated with risk scores > 2 [odds ratio (OR) 10.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.35–50.43], and with detected HIV‐1 RNA (OR 26.06; 95% CI 3.91–173.60). Conclusions When the sample occurrence of discordance between the first and second tests is below 5%, discordant rapid tests in an adult with sexual risk behaviour should trigger strong suspicion of early HIV infection in low HIV prevalence populations.Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (D43TW009608-02S1)
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- National human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and Reproductive Health Survey 2012 (plus II): Human immunodeficiency virus TestingJournal of HIV and Human Reproduction, 2014
- Causes of false-positive HIV rapid diagnostic test resultsExpert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 2013
- False Positive HIV Diagnoses in Resource Limited Settings: Operational Lessons Learned for HIV ProgrammesPLOS ONE, 2013
- Potential for false positive HIV test results with the serial rapid HIV testing algorithmBMC Research Notes, 2012
- The Detection of Acute HIV InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Alternative Algorithms for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Diagnosis Using Tests That Are Licensed in the United StatesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- Improved detection of acute HIV-1 infection in sub-Saharan Africa: development of a risk score algorithmAIDS, 2007
- Limitations of rapid HIV-1 tests during screening for trials in Uganda: diagnostic test accuracy studyBMJ, 2007
- Rapid, Real‐Time Detection of Acute HIV Infection in Patients in AfricaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2007
- False-Positive Results of Enzyme Immunoassays for Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Patients with Uncomplicated MalariaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006