Alternative Axial Distances for Spherical Regions of Central Composite Designs
Open Access
- 9 June 2020
- journal article
- Published by Earthline Publishers in Earthline Journal of Mathematical Sciences
- Vol. 4 (2), 273-285
- https://doi.org/10.34198/ejms.4220.273285
Abstract
Alternatives to the existing axial distances of the Central Composite Design (CCD) in spherical design using three axial distances were studied. The aim of this study is to determine a better alternative to already existing axial distances whose prediction properties are more stable in the spherical design regions. Using the concepts of the three Pythagorean means, the arithmetic, harmonic and geometric axial distances for spherical regions were developed. The performances of the alternative axial distances were compared with the existing ones using the D and G optimality criteria. The study shows that the alternative axial distances are better using the D and G optimality criteria.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Limitation of Fenton Oxidation Operational Parameters: A ReviewInternational Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2012
- Central composite design for the optimization of removal of the azo dye, methyl orange, from waste water using fenton reactionJournal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 2012
- Discussion of “Response surface design evaluation and comparison”Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2009
- Response surface design evaluation and comparisonJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2009
- Graphical Summaries to Compare Prediction Variance Performance for Variations of the Central Composite Design for 6 to 10 FactorsQuality Technology & Quantitative Management, 2009
- Discussion of “Response surface design evaluation and comparison” by C.M. Anderson-Cook, C.M. Borror, and D.C. MontgomeryJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2008
- RSM SimplifiedPublished by Taylor & Francis Ltd ,2004
- On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum ConditionsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 1951