Groundwater Storage Analysis Using Deterministic Model Approach for Water Resources Management of Zamfara part of Sokoto-Rima Basin, Nigeria
Open Access
- 1 March 2022
- journal article
- Published by University of Benin - Faculty of Environmental Sciences in Nigerian Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology
- Vol. 6 (1), 124-138
- https://doi.org/10.36263/nijest.2022.01.0337
Abstract
The study area is entirely located within the Sokoto-Rima hydrological basin of Northwest, Nigeria. Groundwater is widely used for drinking, domestic and agricultural purposes in Zamfara water catchment. The mismanagement of groundwater resources could cause negative effects including depletion of aquifer storage and groundwater level decline. To assure sustainability of the available resources, determination of groundwater budget is necessary. Deterministic model approach was used, which required three quantities (Available water quantity, Abstractible and Storable water volume). In this study meteorological water budget (MWB), water level fluctuation (WTF), and groundwater budget based on geological framework (GBBDF) were used to estimate water budget. Groundwater recharge and abstraction rate were calculated from 280 borehole data across the water catchment area. The average groundwater budget of the study area was calculated as 111,693,470 m3/year with the MWB method and it was calculated as 111,342,057.3m3/year and 73,463,099 m3/year with the WTF and (GBBDF) methods respectively. The groundwater abstraction for domestic/agricultural uses was calculated to be higher to that of aquifer recharge. Thus prudent measure has to be adopted for adequate water use per head as population increase and demographic change will exacerbate more stress on the availability of this precious resources aside the climate change impact. The implication is that further proliferation of borehole wells will deplete the entire aquifer and subject it to be devoid of manageable storage capacity, particularly in the crystalline aquiferous units. It is clear that, if conceptual hydrogeological modelling of the catchment is well known and reliable data are obtained, the MWB method gives accurate results in the basins. However, comparison of multiple methods is valuable for determining the plausible budget amount and for highlighting the uncertainty of the estimate.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combination of soil-water balance models and water-table fluctuation methods for evaluation and improvement of groundwater recharge calculationsHydrogeology Journal, 2011
- Groundwater-recharge estimation in the Ordos Plateau, China: comparison of methodsHydrogeology Journal, 2011
- Groundwater Balance and Safe Yield of the coastal aquifer system in NEastern Korinthia, GreeceApplied Geography, 2006
- A time series approach to inferring groundwater recharge using the water table fluctuation methodWater Resources Research, 2005
- Groundwater recharge and sustainability in the High Plains aquifer in Kansas, USAHydrogeology Journal, 2005
- Statistical analysis of hydrographs and water-table fluctuation to estimate groundwater rechargeJournal of Hydrology, 2004
- The persistence of the water budget myth and its relationship to sustainabilityHydrogeology Journal, 2004
- Net infiltration in the Gran Sasso Massif of central Italy using the Thornthwaite water budget and curve-number methodHydrogeology Journal, 2001
- Urbanization and the groundwater budget, metropolitan Seoul area, KoreaHydrogeology Journal, 2001
- Estimating direct groundwater recharge using a simple water balance model – sensitivity to land surface parametersJournal of Hydrology, 1998