Global component analysis of errors in three satellite-only global precipitation estimates
Open Access
- 9 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Vol. 25 (6), 3087-3104
- https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3087-2021
Abstract
Revealing the error components of satellite-only precipitation products (SPPs) can help algorithm developers and end-users understand their error features and improve retrieval algorithms. Here, two error decomposition schemes are employed to explore the error components of the IMERG-Late, GSMaP-MVK, and PERSIANN-CCS SPPs over different seasons, rainfall intensities, and topography classes. Global maps of the total bias (total mean squared error) and its three (two) independent components are depicted for the first time. The evaluation results for similar regions are discussed, and it is found that the evaluation results for one region cannot be extended to another similar region. Hit and/or false biases are the major components of the total bias in most overland regions globally. The systematic error contributes less than 20 % of the total error in most areas. Large systematic errors are primarily due to missed precipitation. It is found that the SPPs show different topographic patterns in terms of systematic and random errors. Notably, among the SPPs, GSMaP-MVK shows the strongest topographic dependency of the four bias scores. A novel metric, namely the normalized error component (NEC), is proposed as a means to isolate the impact of topography on the systematic and random errors. Potential methods of improving satellite precipitation retrievals and error adjustment models are discussed.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979073)
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Investigating the Evaluation Uncertainty for Satellite Precipitation Estimates Based on Two Different Ground Precipitation Observation ProductsJournal of Hydrometeorology, 2020
- RF-MEP: A novel Random Forest method for merging gridded precipitation products and ground-based measurementsRemote Sensing of Environment, 2020
- Comparison analysis of six purely satellite-derived global precipitation estimatesJournal of Hydrology, 2019
- Impact of the crucial geographic and climatic factors on the input source errors of GPM-based global satellite precipitation estimatesJournal of Hydrology, 2019
- Daily evaluation of 26 precipitation datasets using Stage-IV gauge-radar data for the CONUSHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2019
- A nonparametric statistical technique for combining global precipitation datasets: development and hydrological evaluation over the Iberian PeninsulaHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2018
- Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modelingHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2017
- Systematic and random error components in satellite precipitation data setsGeophysical Research Letters, 2012
- Evaluation of satellite-retrieved extreme precipitation rates across the central United StatesJournal of Geophysical Research, 2011
- Assessing objective techniques for gauge‐based analyses of global daily precipitationJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2008