The Comparability of Perceived Physical and Mental Health Measures Across Immigrants and Natives in the United States
Open Access
- 10 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Duke University Press in Demography
- Vol. 58 (4), 1423-1443
- https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9304855
Abstract
The comparative study of perceived physical and mental health in general—and the comparative study of health between the native-born and immigrants, in particular—requires that the groups understand survey questions inquiring about their health in the same way and display similar response patterns. After all, observed differences in perceived health may not reflect true differences but rather cultural bias in the health measures. Research on cross-country measurement equivalence between immigrants and natives on self-reported health measures has received very limited attention to date, resulting in a growing demand for the validation of existing perceived health measures using samples of natives and immigrants and establishing measurement equivalence of health-related assessment tools. This study, therefore, aims to examine measurement equivalence of self-reported physical and mental health indicators between immigrants and natives in the United States. Using pooled data from the 2015–2017 IPUMS Health Surveys, we examine the cross-group measurement equivalence properties of five concepts that are measured by multiple indicators: (1) perceived limitations in activities of daily life; (2) self-reported disability; (3) perceived functional limitations; (4) perceived financial stress; and (5) nonspecific psychological distress. Furthermore, we examine the comparability of these data among respondents of different ethnoracial origins and from different regions of birth, who report few versus many years since migration, their age, gender, and the language used to respond to the interview (e.g., English vs. Spanish). We test for measurement equivalence using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. The results reveal that health scales are comparable across the examined groups. This finding allows drawing meaningful conclusions about similarities and differences among natives and immigrants on measures of perceived health in these data.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of the integrated health interview series: trends in medical provider utilization (1972-2008)Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 2012
- Variations in Healthcare Access and Utilization Among Mexican Immigrants: The Role of Documentation StatusJournal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2010
- Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2010
- “My health has improved because I always have everything I need here…”: A qualitative exploration of health improvement and decline among immigrantsSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2010
- Factor Analysis with Ordinal Indicators: A Monte Carlo Study Comparing DWLS and ULS EstimationStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
- Global Self-Rated Mental Health: Associations With Other Mental Health Measures and With Role FunctioningMedical Care, 2007
- What Are We Measuring? An Evaluation of the CES-D Across Race/Ethnicity and Immigrant Generation*Social Forces, 2005
- Insights into the ‘healthy immigrant effect’: health status and health service use of immigrants to CanadaSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2004
- The multiple meanings of ataques de nervios in the Latino communityMedical Anthropology, 1989
- The Detection and Correction of Specification Errors in Structural Equation ModelsSociological Methodology, 1987