Do stock investors need to discuss to reduce decision bias?
Open Access
- 11 July 2019
- journal article
- Published by LLC CPC Business Perspectives in Investment Management and Financial Innovations
- Vol. 16 (3), 1-9
- https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(3).2019.01
Abstract
The research examines the role of discussion in investors’ decision in a step-by-step information setting. Several studies present that disclosure strategy stimulates order-effect bias, but simultaneous information decreases the impact of that bias. This bias makes people weigh more heavily to recent observations than they do to older ones. Using step-by-step information, a recency effect is expected to be found. This study uses an experimental method. The participants are the representation of non-professional investors in the stock market because of a lack of knowledge and experience. Participants are also a reflection of the customer easiness in registering to be stock traders. The role of discussion between participants is a new feature of this experiment. After evaluating participants’ decision in a discussion, the experiment shows that an individual’s choice after discussion produces more bias, although they already learn the information before the discussion. The research finds that (1) using the within-subject sample, group discussion produces overvaluation (undervaluation) in positive (negative) sequential information, (2) there is bigger price revision when negative sequential information is presented. This study suggests disclosure strategies for companies. Considering a recency bias, companies must present step-by-step information when they disclose good news, but they must avoid step-by-step disclosures when giving bad news. The second practical implication is for investors; they need to think about the benefits of joining an investor club, since the discussion exacerbates recency bias. These results are expected to contribute to finance literature.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Surabaya (–)
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knowledge management and reuse in tourism destination observatoriesInternational Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 2015
- Primacy or Recency? A Study of Order Effects When Nonprofessional Investors are Provided a Long Series of DisclosuresBehavioral Research in Accounting, 2011
- Long Series of Information and Nonprofessional Investors' Belief RevisionBehavioral Research in Accounting, 2007
- Eliminating recency with self‐review: the case of auditors' ‘going concern’ judgmentsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2002
- Too Many Cooks Spoil the Profits: Investment Club PerformanceCFA Magazine, 2000
- Analysts' Reactions to Warnings of Negative Earnings SurprisesJournal of Accounting Research, 1999
- An examination of market efficiency: Information order effects in a laboratory marketAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1997
- Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment modelCognitive Psychology, 1992
- The Robustness of the Recency Effect: Studies Using Legal EvidenceThe Journal of General Psychology, 1986
- Does the Stock Market Overreact?The Journal of Finance, 1985