Same yardstick, different results: efficacy of rubrics in science education assessment
Open Access
- 29 July 2022
- journal article
- Published by OU Scientific Route in EUREKA: Social and Humanities
- No. 4,p. 82-90
- https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2022.002455
Abstract
Assessments have become integral to today's teaching and learning. Within the world of assessments, there are two paramount ideologies at work: assessments for learning and assessments of learning. The latter are typically administered at the end of a unit or grading period and evaluate a student’s understanding by comparing their achievement against a class, nationwide benchmark, or standard. The former assesses a student’s understanding of a skill or lesson during the learning and teaching process. Assessment for learning enables teachers to collect data that will help them adjust their teaching strategies, and students to adjust their learning strategies. In order to achieve this goal, teachers can make use of several assessment tools, such as concept maps, oral presentations, peer review, portfolios, examinations, written reports, and rubrics. The use of rubrics not only makes the teacher’s standards and result grading explicit but can give students a clear sense of what the expectations are for a high level of performance on a given science assignment. In this study, quantitative data were collected from tasks, assessed by 10 teachers who were purposefully sampled; while qualitative data were collected from interview responses of the same teachers to explore the extent of uniformity in the use of rubrics. The researchers compared and analyzed the different scores, allocated by the respective participants, and analyzed the qualitative data using qualitative data analysis. The study suggests that if interpreted and used well, rubrics support learning by enabling an efficient, consistent, objective, and quick way of assessing students’ work thereby facilitating learning.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating a large-scale implementation of Assessment for Learning in SwedenAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2014
- The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubricsEducational Review, 2014
- Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: Developing a framework of actions and strategiesEducational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2014
- Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance / Rúbricas y guiones de autoevaluación: efectos sobre la autorregulación y el rendimiento de estudiantes universitarios de primer añoJournal for the Study of Education and Development, 2014
- To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacyAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2013
- Student Self-AssessmentPublished by SAGE Publications ,2013
- GradingPublished by SAGE Publications ,2013
- Rubric?referenced self?assessment and middle school students’ writingAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2010
- Putting Rubrics to the Test: The Effect of a Model, Criteria Generation, and Rubric‐Referenced Self‐Assessment on Elementary School Students' WritingEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2008
- Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: an empirical study of student peer‐group ratingInternational Journal of Science Education, 2003