Permeability of artificial barriers (fences) for wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Mediterranean mixed landscapes
Open Access
- 14 March 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pest Management Science
- Vol. 78 (6), 2277-2286
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6853
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fences are one of the most widespread manmade features in nature, constituting an artificial limitation to the movement of wildlife. To date, their effects on wildlife behavior have been understudied but this knowledge is required to design effective management procedures. Using 21 GPS-monitored wild boar, we evaluated the permeability of different types of fences and described temporal patterns and spatial hotspots for crossing events. A fence's permeability was inferred by the crossing success, i.e., the number of times that animals crossed a barrier vs the number of times they did not cross. The vulnerability of fences at watercourses was explored by assessing whether the frequency of crossings was higher around watercourse intersections than expected by chance. RESULTS Well-maintained big game proof fences were the most effective in reducing successful wild boar crossings; they were, on average, 30% more efficient than livestock type fences. Crossing success was higher for males than females and during the food shortage period than in the food abundance period. The frequency of crossings around watercourses was higher than expected by chance, especially in moderately and well-maintained big game proof type fences. CONCLUSION While no fence type was 100% wild boar proof, well-maintained big game proof fences substantially constrained the movement of boar. However, they are vulnerable around watercourses. Managing the conflicts in which this species is involved, such as shared infections and agricultural damage, would require fences that are even more effective than the ones analyzed here, ideally in conjunction with other preventive actions.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Commission (IJC2020‐042629‐I)
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (AGL2016‐76358‐R)
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fragmentation of the Habitat of Wild Ungulates by Anthropogenic Barriers in MongoliaPLOS ONE, 2013
- Trap-effectiveness and response to tiletamine-zolazepam and medetomidine anaesthesia in Eurasian wild boar captured with cage and corral trapsBMC Veterinary Research, 2013
- A framework for understanding semi‐permeable barrier effects on migratory ungulatesJournal of Applied Ecology, 2012
- Evaluation of fences for containing feral swine under simulated depopulation conditionsThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2011
- A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement researchProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Evaluation of Electric Fencing to Inhibit Feral Pig MovementsThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2008
- Evaluation of different designs of temporary electric fence systems for the protection of maize against wild boar (Sus scrofa L., Mammalia, Suidae)Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 2008
- Fences and Deer-Damage Management: A Review of Designs and EfficacyWildlife Society Bulletin, 2006
- EFFICACY OF HUNTING, FEEDING, AND FENCING TO REDUCE CROP DAMAGE BY WILD BOARSThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2004
- A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974