AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program
- 31 May 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 63 (5), 502-512
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.007
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emerging Methods in Comparative Effectiveness and SafetyMedical Care, 2007
- Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approachBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2007
- External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”The Lancet, 2005
- Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT StatementAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Assessing harmful effects in systematic ReviewsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2004
- Benefits and harms of drug treatmentsBMJ, 2004
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004
- Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials – a systematic surveyBMC Clinical Pharmacology, 2001
- Completeness of Safety Reporting in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2001
- Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and managementThe Lancet, 2000