Correlation of attending and patient assessment of resident communication skills in the emergency department
- 22 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in AEM Education and Training
- Vol. 5 (4), e10629
- https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10629
Abstract
Background Communication and interpersonal skills are one of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s six core competencies. Validated methods for assessing these among trainees are lacking. Educators have developed various communication assessment tools from both the supervising attending and patient perspectives. How these different assessment methods and tools compare with each other remains unknown. The goal of this study was to determine the degree of agreement between attending and patient assessment of resident communication skills. Methods This was a retrospective study of Emergency Medicine (EM) residents at an academic medical center. From July 2017 – June 2018, residents were assessed on communication skills during their emergency department shifts by both their supervising attending physicians and their patients. The attendings rated residents’ communication skills with patients, colleagues, and nursing/ancillary staff using a 1-5 Likert scale. Patients completed the modified Communication Assessment Tool (CAT), a 14-item questionnaire based on a 1-5 Likert scale. Mean attending ratings and patient CAT scores were calculated for each resident. Means were divided into tertiles due to nonparametric distribution of scores. Agreement between attending and patient ratings of residents were measured using Cohen’s kappa for each attending evaluation question. Scores were weighted to assign adjacent tertiles partial agreement. Results During the study period, 1097 attending evaluations and 952 patient evaluations were completed for 26 residents. Attending scores and CAT scores of the residents showed slight to fair agreement in the following three domains: patient communication (k 0.21), communication with colleagues (k 0.21) and communication with nursing/ancillary staff (k 0.26). Conclusions Attending and patient ratings of EM residents’ communication skills show slight to fair agreement. The use of different types of raters may be beneficial in fully assessing trainees’ communication skills.Keywords
Funding Information
- Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (Education Research Grant/EF2018‐002)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physiciansʼ Empathy and Clinical Outcomes for Diabetic PatientsAcademic Medicine, 2011
- Direct Observation of Clinical Practice in Emergency Medicine EducationAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2010
- Assessing patient perceptions of hospitalist communication skills using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2010
- Use of a 360-Degree Evaluation in the Outpatient Setting: The Usefulness of Nurse, Faculty, Patient/Family, and Resident Self-EvaluationJournal of Graduate Medical Education, 2010
- Real‐Time Inter‐Rater Reliability of the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors Standardized Direct Observation Assessment ToolAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2009
- Patient perspectives on communication with the medical team: Pilot study using the communication assessment tool-team (CAT-T)Patient Education and Counseling, 2008
- Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance:A 360-degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills11Academic Radiology, 2004
- An Evaluation of Emergency Medicine Resident Interaction Time with Faculty in Different Teaching VenuesAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Assessing Physicians’ Interpersonal SkillsAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2002
- Assessment of Communication and Interpersonal Skills CompetenciesAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2002