Behavioral state resource selection in invasive wild pigs in the Southeastern United States
Open Access
- 25 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 11 (1), 1-14
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86363-3
Abstract
Elucidating correlations between wild pig (Sus scrofa) behavior and landscape attributes can aid in the advancement of management strategies for controlling populations. Using GPS data from 49 wild pigs in the southeastern U.S., we used hidden Markov models to define movement path characteristics and assign behaviors (e.g., resting, foraging, travelling). We then explored the connection between these behaviors and resource selection for both sexes between two distinct seasons based on forage availability (i.e., low forage, high forage). Females demonstrated a crepuscular activity pattern in the high-forage season and a variable pattern in the low-forage season, while males exhibited nocturnal activity patterns across both seasons. Wild pigs selected for bottomland hardwoods and dense canopy cover in all behavioral states in both seasons. Males selected for diversity in vegetation types while foraging in the low-forage season compared to the high-forage season and demonstrated an increased use of linear anthropogenic features across seasons while traveling. Wild pigs can establish populations and home ranges in an array of landscapes, but our results demonstrate male and female pigs exhibit clear differences in movement behavior and there are key resources associated with common behaviors that can be targeted to improve the efficiency of management programs.This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan areaJournal of Mammalogy, 2013
- pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curvesBMC Bioinformatics, 2011
- The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designsPhilosophical Transactions B, 2010
- Annual and seasonal space use of different age classes of female wild boar Sus scrofa L.European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2007
- The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animalsEcological Modelling, 2006
- Resource Selection Functions Based on Use–Availability Data: Theoretical Motivation and Evaluation MethodsThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2006
- A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence modelsEnvironmental Conservation, 1997
- Resource Partitioning in Sympatric Populations of Collared Peccaries and Feral Hogs in Southern TexasJournal of Mammalogy, 1995
- Activity budgets and use of enclosed space by wild boars (Sus scrofa) in captivityZoo Biology, 1988
- Home Ranges, Movements, and Habitat Use of European Wild Boar in TennesseeThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1981