Unsticking the status quo
- 20 February 2017
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Management Research Review
- Vol. 40 (2), 122-141
- https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-08-2015-0183
Abstract
Purpose Managerial mindset and cognitive bias can be barriers to any transformation strategy. In the case of telework, most employees express willingness to telework, yet, few firms formally enable it during regular business hours. The status quo is a daily commute to the traditional workplace. The purpose of this paper is to test framing interventions designed to harness cognitive biases through choice architecture. Design/methodology/approach Drawing upon behavioral strategy and prospect theory, this paper presents two studies: quasi-experiments with 146 senior business students and experiments in the field (replication using random assignment and extension) with 84 senior decision makers. Both studies use a one-way between-subjects design and chi-square analysis. Findings Findings support the proposition that, although cognitive biases can act as barriers to transformation, they can be re-framed through strategic interventions. Specifically, in both studies, there was a drastic increase in adoption simply by changing the way the choice was presented. Findings in the lab were cross-validated in the field. Observed shifts in preferences provide evidence that embedding the right reference point within communications can frame a decision choice more favorably. Findings also support that a bias for an implicitly perceived status quo can be overruled through an explicitly stated reference point. Research limitations/implications It is an assumption of behavioral strategy that most individuals simply respond to the gains/loss framing without being influenced by other psychological or contextual factors, and though these effects dissipate through aggregation, it is a limitation nonetheless. Indeed, using an individual construct to explain an organizational phenomenon is a well-debated topic in the field of strategy, with proponents on both sides. The distinguishing factor, here, is that behavioral strategists are only interested in results at the aggregated level. Practical implications Practitioners attempting to roll out telework adoption, or any transformation, now have proven strategies for designing frames of reference that intervene against and harness the power of loss aversion and the status quo. Social implications This paper measures micro processes that have an effect at the macro level. It explains systematic aversion to adoption as an aggregation of decision-making behavior that is seemingly subconscious. In doing so, it highlights the impact of bounded rationality perpetuated through social systems, while measuring effective interventions designed to make systematic behavior more predictable. Originality/value A novel contribution is made in designing/testing a new frame for systematic resistance to change that frames the status quo as the losing prospect. In this frame, the perceived loss is in the choice not to change, and loss aversion proves to be an effective tool for facilitating systematic change.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects Of Endowment And Loss Aversion In Managerial Stock Option ValuationThe Academy of Management Journal, 2007
- Successfully increasing technological control through minimizing workplace resistance: understanding the willingness to teleworkManagement Decision, 2002
- Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and InstitutionOrganization Studies, 1997
- Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent ModelThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991
- Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political ChoiceAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- Choices, values, and frames.American Psychologist, 1984
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost ApproachAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1981
- Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and CeremonyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974