Filling the evidentiary gap in climate litigation
- 28 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Nature Climate Change
- Vol. 11 (8), 651-655
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01086-7
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NE/S007474/1)
- Oxford University | Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford
- Foundation for International Law for the Environment Climate Analytics
- Foundation for International Law for the Environment
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attribution of Weather and Climate EventsAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 2017
- Acts of God, human influence and litigationNature Geoscience, 2017
- The Legally Disruptive Nature of Climate ChangeThe Modern Law Review, 2017
- Perspective has a strong effect on the calculation of historical contributions to global warmingEnvironmental Research Letters, 2017
- Human influence on climate in the 2014 southern England winter floods and their impactsNature Climate Change, 2016
- Causal Counterfactual Theory for the Attribution of Weather and Climate-Related EventsBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2016
- Sensitivities of the equilibrium line altitude to temperature and precipitation changes along the AndesQuaternary Research, 2014
- Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat waveGeophysical Research Letters, 2012
- Coastal inundation and damage exposure estimation: a case study for JakartaNatural Hazards, 2010
- Climate Change Detection and Attribution: Beyond Mean Temperature SignalsJournal of Climate, 2006