A multidimensional framework for rating health system performance and sustainability: A nine plus one ranking system
Open Access
- 8 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by International Society of Global Health in Journal of Global Health
Abstract
Background Health Care provision in terms of prevention, detection and treatment is primarily dependent on the quality of the hosting Health System. In its health report 2000, the WHO's attempt to assess and rank health systems' quality Worldwide was heavily criticized. We propose a novel framework for health system performance and ranking using three indicators for three domains; general health system performance, clinical outcome of treatment applied to the main causes of death and health system sustainability domains. Methods Each domain was rated as "A - high", "B - intermediate" or "C - poor" according to the aggregate score values of its three indicators. Hence the highest rank a health system can achieve is "AAA" and the lowest is "CCC". If there is a need to define a "numerical rank" to further differentiate health systems with similar rating from one another, the total health expenditure per capita per year was used as an additional "number 10" indicator to achieve that level of differentiation. The framework was applied to Health Systems serving most of the World population including China, India, Brazil, USA, Russia, Germany, Japan, UK, France, Singapore and Switzerland. Data pertinent to each indicator was captured from published reports in peer-reviewed journals and/or from official websites. A Delphi survey was conducted for data not available online. Results Among the 11 health systems tested, no one scored AAA, Switzerland, France, Germany and Japan scored AAB, Singapore scored ABB, UK scored BBB, USA, Russia and China scored BBC, Brazil scored BCC while India scored CCC. Total health expenditure per capita per year lead to ranking Switzerland first followed by France, Germany, and Japan. Conclusion This novel ranking system is a practical and an applicable tool that test health system performance and sustainability. It can be utilized to guide all organizations, people and actions whose primary intent is to promote, restore or maintain health to achieve their targets. An International Health System Ranking database that will be hosted by the Institute of Global, Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring Progress towards Universal Health Coverage at Country and Global LevelsPLoS Medicine, 2014
- Health Care Systems in Low- and Middle-Income CountriesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Health systems performance assessment in low-income countries: learning from international experiencesGlobalization and Health, 2014
- The World Health Report 2000: 10 years onHealth Policy and Planning, 2010
- Health service accreditation as a predictor of clinical and organisational performance: a blinded, random, stratified studyQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2010
- Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: An emerging conceptJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2005
- Judging health systems: reflections on WHO's methodsThe Lancet, 2003
- A critique of the World Health Organisation's evaluation of health system performanceHealth Economics, 2003
- WHO Ranking of Health System PerformanceScience, 2001
- Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000The Lancet, 2001