Content Analysis of Resilience Indicators for Mainstreaming Resilience into Semarang City's Development Planning Policies
Open Access
- 31 October 2020
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University (LPPM UNDIP) in The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development
- Vol. 5 (2), 45-57
- https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.5.2.45-57
Abstract
Resilience assessment has been conducted in Semarang City by two different organizations using two different methods, i.e., City Resilience Index (CRI) and Urban Community Resilience Assessment (UCRA) in 2017 and 2018. Based on the result of those resilience assessments, it reveals that some of the resilience indicators are not suitable for local conditions in Semarang City regarding development planning policies. City strategic planning is a mid-term development planning policy with a combination of sectoral planning and comprehensive planning to budgeting process of the local government programs. It also includes local government performance indicators that reflect the level of good governance and lead to enhance city resilience. Hence, indicators in city strategic planning also can be considered as resilience indicators. All of this implies that city strategic planning describes the local government already uses resilience thinking in its strategies, policies, and programs. However, city resilience encompasses many aspects and more complex. This study aims to identify between CRI and UCRA, which method having resilience indicators that are compatible, applicable, and suitable for Semarang’s city strategic planning. CRI and UCRA use different methods and aim at different scopes when assessing resilience in the city. The results of the content analysis on the document of development planning policies, such as the 2016-2021 Semarang’s city strategic planning and Revision of the 2016-2021 Semarang’s city strategic planning, highlight the similarities and differences between CRI and UCRA. It reveals that CRI’s resilience indicators are more compatible, applicable, and suitable for Semarang’s city strategic planning rather than UCRA’s resilience indicators.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The politics of resilient cities: whose resilience and whose city?Building Research & Information, 2013
- “Shared learning” for building urban climate resilience – experiences from Asian citiesEnvironment and Urbanization, 2013
- Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental riskCities, 2013
- Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End? “Reframing” Resilience: Challenges for Planning Theory and Practice Interacting Traps: Resilience Assessment of a Pasture Management System in Northern Afghanistan Urban Resilience: What Does it Mean in Planning Practice? Resilience as a Useful Concept for Climate Change Adaptation? The Politics of Resilience for Planning: A Cautionary NotePlanning Theory & Practice, 2012
- Resilience implications of policy responses to climate changeWires Climate Change, 2011
- The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approachCambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2010
- Social–ecological systems and adaptive governance of the commonsEcological Research, 2006
- Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analysesGlobal Environmental Change, 2006
- Reframing the Metaphor of the Citizen-Government Relationship: A Value-Centered PerspectivePublic Administration Review, 1997
- Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1984