The Four Ways to Consider Measurement Noise in Bayesian Model Selection—And Which One to Choose
Open Access
- 22 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 57 (11)
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2021wr030391
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A hypothesis‐driven approach to optimize field campaignsWater Resources Research, 2012
- Bayesian assessment of the expected data impact on prediction confidence in optimal sampling designWater Resources Research, 2012
- Assessing the uncertainties of hydrologic model selection in climate change impact studiesHydrological Processes, 2011
- Improving Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Bayesian Phylogenetic Model SelectionSystematic Biology, 2010
- Comparison of aquifer characterization approaches through steady state groundwater model validation: A controlled laboratory sandbox studyWater Resources Research, 2010
- Nested sampling for general Bayesian computationBayesian Analysis, 2006
- Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising arable cropsFEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2001
- Bayesian Model Selection and Model AveragingJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 2000
- Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authorsStatistical Science, 1999
- Bayes FactorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995