A simple method to detect leaks after left atrial appendage occlusion with Watchman
- 29 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 31 (9), 2338-2343
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14641
Abstract
Background We evaluated the efficacy of a new method in identifying peri‐device leak (PDL) using morphology of the thrombus formed inside the left atrial appendage (LAA) as seen on follow‐up transesophageal echo (TEE). Method A total of 291 consecutive patients undergoing Watchman procedure were included in this analysis. TEE was performed at 45 days post‐procedure. Based on the presence of the thrombus inside the LAA behind the device, patients were grouped as 1) White (W) group: LAA completely filled with thrombus (n=101), 2) Non‐white (NW) group: LAA completely black or mixed (part black and part white) (n=190). Follow‐up TEE was repeated at 6 and 12 months. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups except the device size, number of patients with chicken‐wing morphology and prevalence of left atrial ‘smoke’ that were significantly higher in the NW group. Detection of black appearance was comparable between the pre‐coil closure image and the NW population (26/36 (72.2%) vs 99/154 (64.3%), p=0.37). After adjusting for clinically relevant covariates, NW appearance of the LAA was associated with the presence of significant leak (OR 47.96, 95% CI: 2.91‐790.2, p‐value < 0.001). Of the 11 patients with mixed appearance at the 6‐month TEE remained unchanged (part black and part white) at the 12‐month TEE. LAA appearance was white in all 36 patients following coil closure. Conclusion Our findings demonstrated White and Non‐White appearance of the appendage on TEE to be reliable markers of complete closure and leak respectively, following LAA occlusion with the Watchman device.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of dense “smoke” detected on transesophageal echocardiography on stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablationHeart Rhythm, 2019
- Left atrial appendage patency and device-related thrombus after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: a computed tomography studyEuropean Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging, 2018
- Clinical Implications of Leaks Following Left Atrial Appendage Ligation With the LARIAT DeviceJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2016
- Left Atrial Appendage and ClosureCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2016
- Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: multicentre experience with the AMPLATZER Cardiac PlugEuroIntervention, 2016
- Endocardial (Watchman) vs epicardial (Lariat) left atrial appendage exclusion devices: Understanding the differences in the location and type of leaks and their clinical implicationsHeart Rhythm, 2015
- Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of StrokeStroke, 2014
- EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusionEP Europace, 2014
- The Clinical Impact of Incomplete Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the Watchman Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) SubstudyJournal of Invasive Cardiology, 2012
- Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion (PLAATO System) to Prevent Stroke in High-Risk Patients With Non-Rheumatic Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the International Multi-Center Feasibility TrialsJournal of Invasive Cardiology, 2005