A method for systematically ranking therapeutic drug candidates using multiple uncertain screening criteria
Open Access
- 13 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Statistical Methods in Medical Research
- Vol. 30 (6), 1502-1522
- https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802211002861
Abstract
Multiple different screening tests for candidate leads in drug development may often yield conflicting or ambiguous results, sometimes making the selection of leads a nontrivial maximum-likelihood ranking problem. Here, we employ methods from the field of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) to the problem of screening candidate antibody therapeutics. We employ the SMAA-TOPSIS method to rank a large cohort of antibodies using up to eight weighted screening criteria, in order to find lead candidate therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease, and determine their robustness to both uncertainty in screening measurements, as well as uncertainty in the user-defined weights of importance attributed to each screening criterion. To choose lead candidates and measure the confidence in their ranking, we propose two new quantities, the Retention Probability and the Topness, as robust measures for ranking. This method may enable more systematic screening of candidate therapeutics when it becomes difficult intuitively to process multi-variate screening data that distinguishes candidates, so that additional candidates may be exposed as potential leads, increasing the likelihood of success in downstream clinical trials. The method properly identifies true positives and true negatives from synthetic data, its predictions correlate well with known clinically approved antibodies vs. those still in trials, and it allows for ranking analyses using antibody developability profiles in the literature. We provide a webserver where users can apply the method to their own data: http://bjork.phas.ubc.ca.Funding Information
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Transitional Operating Grant 2682)
- Alberta Prion Research Institute (Research Team Program Grant PTM13007)
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mathematical analysis of fuel cell strategic technologies development solutions in the automotive industry by the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision making methodInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011
- Principles of early drug discoveryBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 2011
- A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planningEcological Economics, 2009
- Statistical methods for analysis of high-throughput RNA interference screensNature Methods, 2009
- Natural oligomers of the amyloid-β protein specifically disrupt cognitive functionNature Neuroscience, 2004
- UCSF Chimera?A visualization system for exploratory research and analysisJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2004
- Improved Statistical Methods for Hit Selection in High-Throughput ScreeningSLAS Discovery, 2003
- Statistical and Graphical Methods for Quality Control Determination of High-Throughput Screening DataSLAS Discovery, 2003
- The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDMTourism Management, 2002
- A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise SolutionsJournal of the Operational Research Society, 1987