Rate of continuing acute course treatment using right unilateral ultrabrief pulse electroconvulsive therapy at a large academic medical center
- 16 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten
- Vol. 271 (1), 191-197
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-020-01202-2
Abstract
Right unilateral ultrabrief pulse (RUL-UBP) ECT has emerged as a promising technique for minimizing cognitive side effects of ECT while retaining clinical efficacy, but it is unknown how often patients will require alternative treatment parameters and at what point in the treatment course this occurs. To better define this problem, this study analyzes continuation in RUL-UBP ECT in a retrospective cohort of patients beginning acute course treatment. A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted of adult patients receiving a first lifetime course of ECT from 2010 to 2017 starting with RUL-UBP treatment parameters. 1793 patients met study criteria. Patients received a mean of 10.0 ± 3.2 ECT treatments, of which a mean of 8.4 ± 3.4 were RUL-UBP treatments; proportion using RUL-UBP through 12 treatments was 57.8%. In total, 65.6% of patients were treated with RUL-UPB ECT exclusively. Mean dose increased from 7.6 × seizure threshold at the second RUL-UBP treatment to 14.3 × seizure threshold at the twelfth RUL-UBP treatment. Rates of continuation in RUL-UBP ECT did not differ based on age or on primary diagnosis of major depression vs. bipolar disorder. Among patients beginning acute-course treatment using RUL-UPB ECT, two thirds were treated with these parameters exclusively. Among patients who received twelve RUL-UBP treatments, mean final dose was 14.3 × seizure threshold. Further studies regarding optimal dosing of RUL-UBP ECT are indicated.Funding Information
- National Institute of Mental Health (R25MH094612, R01MH120991, 5R01MH112737-03)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R56MH115187)
- National Institute on Aging (5R01AG061100-02)
- Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD 26489)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Total Charge Required to Induce a Seizure in a Retrospective Cohort of Patients Undergoing Dose Titration of Right Unilateral Ultrabrief Pulse Electroconvulsive TherapyThe Journal of ECT, 2021
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysisBMJ, 2019
- Modern Electroconvulsive TherapyJAMA Psychiatry, 2017
- Right Unilateral Ultrabrief Pulse ECT in Geriatric Depression: Phase 1 of the PRIDE StudyAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2016
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Brief Versus Ultrabrief Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy for DepressionBritish Journal of Psychology, 2015
- Practical Considerations in the Use of Ultrabrief ECT in Clinical PracticeThe Journal of ECT, 2014
- Efficacy of ultrabrief pulse electroconvulsive therapy for depression: A systematic reviewJournal of Affective Disorders, 2013
- When to Switch From Unilateral to Bilateral Electroconvulsive TherapyThe Journal of ECT, 2011
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Stimulus ParametersThe Journal of ECT, 2010
- Continuation Electroconvulsive Therapy vs Pharmacotherapy for Relapse Prevention in Major DepressionArchives of General Psychiatry, 2006