Evaluation of pain relief treatment and timelines in emergency care in six European countries and Australia
Open Access
- 1 September 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Open Access Emergency Medicine
- Vol. ume 11, 229-240
- https://doi.org/10.2147/oaem.s214396
Abstract
Purpose: Inadequate relief of pain is common in prehospital and hospital emergency department (ED) settings. We investigated pain treatments and timelines in patients receiving pre-hospital and hospital ED care to provide insight into potential approaches to reduce the burden of trauma-related pain. Patients and methods: In this observational, retrospective chart review, patients had received emergency care for musculoskeletal trauma injuries and analgesic treatment for moderate-to-severe pain in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain or Sweden. As inhaled low-dose methoxyflurane (LDM) is used extensively in Australia but was not widely available in Europe at the time of this analysis, data from Australia were collated to provide insight into the potential utility of this analgesic in Europe. The primary endpoint was time to administration of first pain relief treatment following arrival of paramedic/ED care. Results: Randomly selected physicians (n=189) collated data from 856 patients (Europe: n=585; Australia: n=271) via an online survey. Time to first pain relief treatment varied between countries and was significantly longer across Europe versus Australia (mean [SD] 38.1 [34.7] vs 29.9 [35.5] mins; P=0.0017). Patients from Australia who received LDM experience a shorter mean (SD) time to first pain treatment following arrival of emergency care versus patients who received other analgesics (propensity score matched [n=85] per group: 21.7 [24.2] vs 39.1 [43.0] mins; P=0.0013). Across all countries, mean (SD) time to first analgesic was shorter when treatment was administered by paramedics versus hospital ED staff (15.7 [14.7] vs 49.1 [38.4] mins). Conclusions: While there was a large variation in analgesia timelines across countries, mean times are shorter in Australia compared with Europe overall. In Australia, use of LDM was associated with a significantly shorter time from emergency assistance to first pain treatment compared with non-LDM treatments. Further studies are needed to investigate the utility of LDM in Europe.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of a pilot team on patients’ pain reduction and satisfaction in an emergency department: A before-and-after observational studyRevue D'epidemiologie Et de Sante Publique, 2016
- Assessment of pain in a Norwegian Emergency Department.Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2015
- Effective Pain Management and Improvements in Patients’ Outcomes and SatisfactionCritical Care Nurse, 2015
- STOP!: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of methoxyflurane for the treatment of acute painEmergency Medicine Journal, 2014
- Undertreatment of acute pain (oligoanalgesia) and medical practice variation in prehospital analgesia of adult trauma patients: a 10 yr retrospective studyBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2012
- Paramedic Attitudes Regarding Prehospital AnalgesiaPrehospital Emergency Care, 2012
- Prehospital Analgesia in New South Wales, AustraliaPrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2011
- Causes and Consequences of Inadequate Management of Acute PainPain Medicine, 2010
- Review article: Efficacy and safety of methoxyflurane analgesia in the emergency department and prehospital settingEmergency Medicine Australasia, 2009
- Pain in an emergency department: an auditEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2006