Comparing the risk of mortality from solid cancer after radiation incidents and occupational radiation exposure
- 20 October 2021
- journal article
- Published by FSBI Research Institute of Occupational Health RAMS in Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology
- Vol. 61 (9), 580-587
- https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-9-580-587
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to compare the excess relative risk (ERR per 1 Sv) of solid cancer mortality in acute - catastrophic or emergency, and occupational - fractionated or chronic exposure. Materials and research methods. A maintained database (database of sources) on nuclear workers from about 40 countries, on the basis of it a combined data analysis was carried out to determine the integral ERR value per 1 Gy for cancer mortality for comparison with parameters of cohorts exposed to catastrophic and emergency exposure: the LSS cohort victims of the atomic bombings in Japan, residents of the Techa River (radioactive contamination due to emissions from the Mayak plant) and Russian liquidators of the Chernobyl accident. Results. Comparison of the ERR per 1 Sv for cancer mortality for workers in the global nuclear industry (combining analysis of data from 37 studies) with the parameters of the LSS cohort, residents on the Techa River and liquidators of the Chernobyl accident showed the absence of logical and principial differences, and the risks for the last two cohorts were the highest. Although the data obtained partly confirm the approach of recent years by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, according to which the carcinogenic effects of acute, accidental, and fractionated or chronic radiation exposure do not depend on the dose rate factor (DDREF), nevertheless, taking into account biological mechanisms and data radiobiological experiments, this issue cannot be considered unambiguously resolved. Conclusion. Based on the ERR per 1 Sv, the average external dose, and the annual background cancer mortality in Russia and the United States, the expected increase in cancer mortality for 100,000 nuclear workers will average 32-69 people over 10 years (0.032-0.069% of the group). Such risks, due to the many carcinogenic non-radiation factors of life and work, as well as fluctuations in the background value, cannot be taken into account in the practice of medicine and health care.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incomplete data on the Canadian cohort may have affected the results of the study by the International Agency for Research on Cancer on the radiogenic cancer risk among nuclear industry workers in 15 countriesJournal of Radiological Protection, 2010
- Review and evaluation of updated research on the health effects associated with low-dose ionising radiationRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 2010
- The evolution of evidence hierarchies: what can Bradford Hill's ‘guidelines for causation’ contribute?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2009
- Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation WorkersBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- External radiation exposure and mortality in a cohort of French nuclear workersOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2007
- Concept of optimisation of the radiation protection system in the nuclear sector: management of individual cancer risks and providing targeted health careJournal of Radiological Protection, 2006
- The Science and Practice of Carcinogen Identification and EvaluationEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2004
- The Relevance of Occupational Epidemiology to Radiation Protection StandardsNEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 1999
- Occupational radiation exposure and mortality: second analysis of the National Registry for Radiation WorkersJournal of Radiological Protection, 1999
- Protocol for a cohort mortality study of occupational radiation exposure based on the National Dose Registry of CanadaEuropean Journal of Cancer, 1997