The Prognostic Value of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Children After Cardiac Arrest: The SEPIA Study
- 4 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
- Vol. 38 (1), 30-35
- https://doi.org/10.1097/wnp.0000000000000649
Abstract
Absent cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) reliably predict poor neurologic outcome in adults after cardiac arrest (CA). However, there is less evidence to support this in children. In addition, targeted temperature management, test timing, and a lack of blinding may affect test accuracy. A single-center, prospective cohort study of pediatric (aged 24 hours to 15 years) patients in which prognostic value of SSEPs were assessed 24, 48, and 72 hours after CA. Targeted temperature management (33–34°C for 24 hours) followed by gradual rewarming to 37°C was used. Somatosensory evoked potentials were graded as present, absent, or indeterminate, and results were blinded to clinicians. Neurologic outcome was graded as “good” (score 1–3) or “poor” (4–6) using the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scale 30 days after CA and blinded to SSEP interpreter. Twelve patients (median age, 12 months; interquartile range, 2–150; 92% male) had SSEPs interpreted as absent (6/12) or present (6/12) <72 hours after CA. Outcome was good in 7 of 12 patients (58%) and poor in 5 of 12 patients (42%). Absent SSEPs predicted poor outcome with 88% specificity (95% confidence interval, 53% to 98%). One patient with an absent SSEP had good outcome (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category 3), and all patients with present SSEPs had good outcome (specificity 100%; 95% confidence interval, 51% to 100%). Absence or presence of SSEP was consistent across 24-hour (temperature = 34°C), 48-hour (t = 36°C), and 72-hour (t = 36°C) recordings after CA. Results support SSEP utility when predicting favorable outcome; however, predictions resulting in withdrawal of life support should be made with caution and never in isolation because in this very small sample there was a false prediction of unfavorable outcome. Further prospective, blinded studies are needed and encouraged.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to assess prognosis after cardiac arrest and therapeutic hypothermiaCritical Care, 2014
- Neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest—Recommendations from the Swedish Resuscitation CouncilResuscitation, 2013
- Prognostication of neurologic outcome in cardiac arrest patients after mild therapeutic hypothermia: a meta-analysis of the current literatureIntensive Care Medicine, 2013
- Does hypothermia influence the predictive value of bilateral absent N20 after cardiac arrest?Neurology, 2010
- Somatosensory evoked potentials during mild hypothermia after cardiopulmonary resuscitationNeurology, 2009
- Interobserver variation in the interpretation of SSEPs in anoxic–ischaemic comaClinical Neurophysiology, 2006
- Guideline 9D: Guidelines on Short-Latency Somatosensory Evoked PotentialsJournal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2006
- The clinical role of evoked potentialsJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2005
- Somatosensory evoked potentials for prediction of outcome in acute severe brain injuryThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1995
- Assessing the outcome of pediatric intensive careThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1992