The moderating effect of environmental agencies on firms’ sustainability reporting in Nigeria
- 1 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Social Responsibility Journal
- Vol. 18 (2), 388-402
- https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-07-2020-0292
Abstract
Purpose: An attempt is made in this study aims to examine the extent to which the role of environmental agencies in Nigeria, i.e. DEPARTMENT for Petroleum Resources (DPR), National Environmental Standard and Regulatory Enforcement Agency (NESREA) and Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE), influences firms’ attributes on sustainability reporting. Design/methodology/approach: Both primary and secondary data covers 2015-2019 were used to collate information for the analyzes. The analysis was done using Stata 13 to determine the moderating impact of policy administrators on the relationship between corporate attributes and sustainability reporting. Findings: The findings showed a very low level of sustainability reporting (27.53%), with a high significant level. Moreover, a positive and significant relationship exists between the major corporate attributes and sustainability reporting. A highly significant moderating impact of environmental policy administrators exists on these attributes, except for board size. Research limitations/implications: The theoretical and practical implications of this study show that there is an indication of the inefficiency of the environmental policy administrators in Nigeria as the significance of the political economy theory as it affects the interactive impact on sustainability reporting. Further research is recommended on political-economic theory so as to know the economic implications of the effects of corporate attributes on environmental disclosure as it impacts governments and societies. Practical implications: Results show that there is an indication of inefficiency by Nigeria’s main environmental policy administrators such as DPR, NESREA and NSE as it affects environmental, economic and social issues by listed firms. Originality/value: This work emphasizes the moderating impact of environmental agencies on the relationship between firms’ characteristics and sustainability disclosure through the GRI4 framework standard. More so, it applied company attributes essential for a firm’s sustainable growth and development in the developing economies of sub-Saharan Africa.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corporate governance and environmental reporting: an Australian studyCorporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 2012
- Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in PortugalCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2010
- Environmental disclosures of palm oil plantation companies in Malaysia: a tool for stakeholder engagementCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2009
- Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate changeCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2008
- Environmental disclosure and performance reporting in MalaysiaAsian Review of Accounting, 2007
- Environmental engagements through the lens of disclosure practicesAsian Review of Accounting, 2006
- The Impact of Financial Reporting Regulation on the Market Valuation of Reported Environmental Liabilities: Preliminary Evidence from US and Canadian Public CompaniesJournal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 2005
- Firms' Voluntary Recognition of Stock‐Based Compensation ExpenseJournal of Accounting Research, 2004
- Social and environmental reporting at the VRA: institutionalised legitimacy or legitimation crisis?Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2004
- Corporate Environmental Reports: The Need for Standards and an Environmental Assurance ServiceAccounting Horizons, 1999