Has Latour Real-ly Unravelled the Real: The Journey from Laboratory Life to Down to Earth?
Open Access
- 21 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Queensland University of Technology in Law, Technology and Humans
- Vol. 2 (2), 22-41
- https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.1551
Abstract
This article traces Bruno Latour’s answer to the question ‘what is real?’ from Latour and Steve Woolgar in Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (1979) through to Latour in Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climate Change (2018). This intriguing question arises because Latour’s hypothesis in Down to Earth presumes that climate change is ‘real’, while in Laboratory Life, hard facts were considered constructions. The journey reveals Latour’s own ‘real’ lies between the extreme science realists (facts are either true or false) and extreme social relativists (facts are a social construction), although favouring the relativists. A closer analysis, however, shows that Latour’s project is really about truth claims and that the real question is couched in terms rejecting the modernist settlement of ontological assumptions and basing truth on credibility determined by the strength of associations; the more associations, the more ‘real’ the truth claim. Ultimately, Latour elegantly sidesteps the real question and how he does this is real-ly unrivalled.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Whole World is Becoming Science Studies: Fadhila Mazanderani Talks with Bruno LatourEngaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2018
- Materializing discourse analysis with James, Schmitt and LatourPalgrave Communications, 2017
- Social Constructivism in Science and Technology StudiesHuman Studies, 2016
- Travels without a donkeyHistory of the Human Sciences, 2014
- Biography of an inquiry: On a book about modes of existenceSocial Studies of Science, 2013
- Another turn after ANT: An interview with Bruno LatourSocial Studies of Science, 2013
- Doing Science, Writing SciencePhilosophy of Science, 2008
- DiscussionStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 1999