Mate Value Discrepancies, the Dark Triad and Relationship Satisfaction: a Euclidean Distances Approach
- 27 September 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Evolutionary Psychological Science
- Vol. 4 (2), 134-140
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0122-8
Abstract
We used a Euclidean algorithmic method of calculating mate value discrepancies to test the hypothesis that mate value discrepancies would mediate a negative association between the Dark Triad and relationship satisfaction. Participants (N = 211) rated themselves, their partner, and their ideal partner on a set of traits known to be important in mate selection. They also completed Dark Triad and relationship satisfaction measures. We found an indirect, negative association between the Dark Triad and relationship satisfaction mediated by the partner-potential partner mate value discrepancy. The higher on the Dark Triad, the more alternative partners there were that were closer to the participant’s ideal mate preferences than their current partner, which was associated with decreased relationship satisfaction. This study contributes to our understanding of how the Dark Triad relates to mating psychology. These findings also highlight the utility of employing a Euclidean algorithm to understand associations between individual differences and relationship outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Euclidean distances discriminatively predict short-term and long-term attraction to potential matesEvolution and Human Behavior, 2017
- Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in IranEvolutionary Psychology, 2017
- The Dark Triad and long-term mate preferences in Iranian womenPersonality and Individual Differences, 2017
- How Are Mate Preferences Linked with Actual Mate Selection? Tests of Mate Preference Integration Algorithms Using Computer Simulations and Actual Mating CouplesPLOS ONE, 2016
- What predicts romantic relationship satisfaction and mate retention intensity: mate preference fulfillment or mate value discrepancies?Evolution and Human Behavior, 2016
- Sex Differences in Mate Preferences: a Replication Study, 20 Years LaterEvolutionary Psychological Science, 2016
- The Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preferences in Relationship Formation: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and Why It MattersSocial and Personality Psychology Compass, 2014
- Sexual exploitability: observable cues and their link to sexual attractionEvolution and Human Behavior, 2012
- Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitudeJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2004
- Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 culturesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1989