Comparative efficiency of airborne pollen concentration evaluation in two pollen sampler designs related to impaction and changes in internal wind speed
- 30 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Atmospheric Environment
- Vol. 203, 18-27
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.039
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pollen and spore monitoring in the worldClinical and Translational Allergy, 2018
- Spores of lichen-forming fungi in the mycoaerosol and their relationships with climate factorsScience of The Total Environment, 2014
- A side-by-side comparison of Rotorod and Burkard pollen and spore collectionsAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2013
- Performance of the Coriolis air sampler, a high-volume aerosol-collection system for quantification of airborne spores and pollen grainsAerobiologia, 2008
- Aspiration efficiency of a thin-walled probe at right angles to the windJournal of Aerosol Science, 2005
- The influence of sampler height and orientation on airborneAmbrosiapollen counts in MontrealGrana, 2000
- Variations of uptake rates in benzene diffusive sampling as a function of ambient conditionsScience of The Total Environment, 1999
- Aerobiologic particle sampling by a new personal collector (Partrap FA52) in comparison to the Hirst (Burkard) sampler.Allergy, 1997
- Aerosol particle losses in isokinetic sampling probe inletsEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1992
- Efficiency of Vertical Cylinder Spore Trap and Seven Day Volumetric Burkard Spore Trap in Monitoring Airborne Pollen and Fungal SporesGrana, 1989