COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary
- 10 May 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 125 (5), 629-640
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01361-6
Abstract
Delivering lung cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant and ongoing challenges. There is a lack of published COVID-19 and lung cancer evidence-based reviews, including for the whole patient pathway. We searched for COVID-19 and lung cancer publications and brought together a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders to review and comment on the evidence and challenges. A rapid review of the literature was undertaken up to 28 October 2020, producing 144 papers, with 113 full texts screened. We focused on new primary data collection (qualitative or quantitative evidence) and excluded case reports, editorials and commentaries. Following exclusions, 15 published papers were included in the review and are summarised. They included one qualitative paper and 14 quantitative studies (surveys or cohort studies), with a total of 2295 lung cancer patients data included (mean study size 153 patients; range 7–803). Review of current evidence and commentary included awareness and help-seeking; lung cancer screening; primary care assessment and referral; diagnosis and treatment in secondary care, including oncology and surgery; patient experience and palliative care. Cross-cutting themes and challenges were identified using qualitative methods for patients, healthcare professionals and service delivery, with a clear need for continued studies to guide evidence-based decision-making.Keywords
Funding Information
- DH | NIHR | Research Trainees Coordinating Centre (DRF-2016-09-054)
- Royal Mardsen Partners
- RCUK | MRC | Medical Research Foundation (MR/T02481X/1)
This publication has 74 references indexed in Scilit:
- Barriers to uptake among high-risk individuals declining participation in lung cancer screening: a mixed methods analysis of the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trialBMJ Open, 2015
- Symptom perceptions and help-seeking behaviour prior to lung and colorectal cancer diagnoses: a qualitative studyFamily Practice, 2015
- An evaluation of the impact of large-scale interventions to raise public awareness of a lung cancer symptomBritish Journal of Cancer, 2014
- Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012International Journal of Cancer, 2014
- Responding to symptoms suggestive of lung cancer: a qualitative interview studyBMJ Open Respiratory Research, 2014
- What is a virtual multidisciplinary team (vMDT)?British Journal of Cancer, 2013
- Measures of promptness of cancer diagnosis in primary care: secondary analysis of national audit data on patients with 18 common and rarer cancersBritish Journal of Cancer, 2013
- Five misconceptions in cancer diagnosisBritish Journal of General Practice, 2009
- Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviewsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Diagnosis of lung cancer in primary care: a structured reviewFamily Practice, 2004