Why documenting every gender bias counts: A short commentary
Open Access
- 30 March 2021
- journal article
- Published by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) in Social Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 16 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.5337
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplinesScience, 2015
- Women in Academic SciencePsychological Science in the Public Interest, 2014
- Women at WorkPolicy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2014
- Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer womenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014
- The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies.Psychological Bulletin, 2011
- Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009
- EditorialEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2009
- Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysisJournal of Informetrics, 2007
- The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome?British Journal of Social Psychology, 2004
- Nepotism and sexism in peer-reviewNature, 1997