Integrating Human Factors Research and Surgery
Open Access
- 1 December 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 147 (12), 1141-1146
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.596
Abstract
Objective To provide a review of human factors research within the context of surgery. Data Sources We searched PubMed for relevant studies published from the earliest available date through February 29, 2012. Study Selection The search was performed using the following keywords: human factors, surgery, errors, teamwork, communication, stress, disruptions, interventions, checklists, briefings, and training. Additional articles were identified by a manual search of the references from the key articles. As 2 human factors specialists, a senior clinician, and a junior clinician, we carefully selected the most appropriate exemplars of research findings with specific relevance to surgical error and safety. Data Extraction Seventy-seven articles of relevance were selected and reviewed in detail. Opinion pieces and editorials were disregarded; the focus was solely on articles based on empirical evidence, with a particular emphasis on prospectively designed studies. Data Synthesis The themes that emerged related to the development of human factors theories, the application of those theories within surgery, a specific interest in the concept of flow, and the theoretical basis and value of human-related interventions for improving safety and flow in surgery. Conclusions Despite increased awareness of safety, errors routinely continue to occur in surgical care. Disruptions in the flow of an operation, such as teamwork and communication failures, contribute significantly to such adverse events. While it is apparent that some incidence of human error is unavoidable, there is much evidence in medicine and other fields that systems can be better designed to prevent or detect errors before a patient is harmed. The complexity of factors leading to surgical errors requires collaborations between surgeons and human factors experts to carry out the proper prospective and observational studies. Only when we are guided by this valid and real-world data can useful interventions be identified and implemented.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Faculty Opinions recommendation of Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles.Published by H1 Connect ,2009
- Identifying methods to improve heart surgery: an operative approach and strategy for implementation on an organizational levelEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic reviewQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2008
- Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS modelPublished by BMJ ,2006
- A prospective study of patient safety in the operating roomSurgery, 2006
- Patient Safety in Surgery: Error Detection and PreventionWorld Journal of Surgery, 2003
- The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992Surgery, 1999
- Understanding adverse events: human factors.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1995
- The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II: Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. N Engl J Med 1991 ;324:377-84. Reprint requests: Dr. Lucian L. Leape, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115American Journal of Infection Control, 1992
- The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systemsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1990