Comparing noninvasive sampling techniques with standard cannula sampling method for ruminal microbial analysis
Open Access
- 9 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Dairy Science Association in JDS Communications
- Vol. 2 (6), 329-333
- https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2021-0094
Abstract
Rumen microbes play an important role in the conversion of indigestible plant material to energy and protein in dairy cows. Sampling for ruminal contents via cannula is considered the gold standard technique for microbial analysis, but the technique requires ruminally cannulated animals and specialized animal facilities. The purpose of this study was to determine whether other sampling methods and locations along the digestive tract may serve as noninvasive proxies to the cannula method for microbial analysis. Six ruminally cannulated lactating Holstein dairy cows were adapted to a standard total mixed ration for 2 wk and sampled during the third week. Sampling locations and methods included salivary content, rumination bolus (regurgitated digesta collected from the cow's mouth), feces, and rumen contents via stomach tube and cannula. Stomach tube and cannula samples differ in proportions of solid and liquid material and were therefore separated into whole (as collected), liquid, and solid fractions. Samples were collected at 0 (before feeding), 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h after feeding over 2 d. All samples were extracted for total genomic DNA and selected samples for metabolically active DNA (RNA), PCR-amplified for the V1-V2 region of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene, and analyzed for bacterial diversity using the QIIME2 pipeline followed by statistical analysis in R (https://www.R-project.org/). In DNA-based analysis, at the community level, saliva, rumination bolus, and fecal samples clustered in separate groups, whereas all fractions of stomach tube and cannula samples clustered together, indicating that microbial communities of stomach tube and cannula samples were homogeneous. Rumination bolus samples at 6, 8, and 12 h after feeding clustered with stomach tube and cannula samples, indicating that rumination bolus samples may be an alternative for cannula samples; however, time of sampling is critical for sampling of bolus digesta. Results of the RNA-based analysis of rumination bolus samples and solid samples from cannula and stomach tube at 0 and 6 h after feeding were similar. We concluded that the solid fraction of samples obtained via the stomach tube method may serve as a proxy for the solid fraction of whole ruminal contents obtained via cannula for DNA-based microbial investigations. Both rumination bolus and stomach tube solid samples may serve as proxies for cannula solid samples for RNA-based microbial analysis.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Buccal Swabbing as a Noninvasive Method To Determine Bacterial, Archaeal, and Eukaryotic Microbial Community Structures in the RumenApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2015
- Bacterial Diversity Dynamics Associated with Different Diets and Different Primer Pairs in the Rumen of Kankrej CattlePLOS ONE, 2014
- Temporal dynamics in the ruminal microbiome of dairy cows during the transition periodJournal of Animal Science, 2014
- Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiomeGenome Research, 2014
- Simultaneous Amplicon Sequencing to Explore Co-Occurrence Patterns of Bacterial, Archaeal and Eukaryotic Microorganisms in Rumen Microbial CommunitiesPLOS ONE, 2013
- Rumination behavior of grazing dairy cows in response to restricted time at pastureLivestock Science, 2012
- ARISA analysis of ruminal bacterial community dynamics in lactating dairy cows during the feeding cycleAnaerobe, 2010
- Rumen Bacterial Diversity Dynamics Associated with Changing from Bermudagrass Hay to Grazed Winter Wheat DietsMicrobial Ecology, 2009
- Comparative studies of microbial populations in the rumen, duodenum, ileum and faeces of lactating dairy cowsJournal of Applied Microbiology, 2009
- Chewing activity of ruminants as a measure of physical structure — A review of factors affecting itAnimal Feed Science and Technology, 1990