The limitations of bioeconomy LCA studies for understanding the transition to sustainable bioeconomy
Open Access
- 26 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Vol. 27 (5), 680-703
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02053-w
Abstract
Purpose Transition to bioeconomy requires all actors and stakeholders to measure the impact of systems that use bioresources and technologies to provision society. There are however some challenges with integrating LCA into business development and management, which have important implications for bioeconomy. There have been many LCA studies published in the twenty-first century, but the question must be answered: how useful are these LCA studies to help understand and manage transition to sustainable bioeconomy? Method This research used a structured literature review to identify 83 bioeconomy LCA studies published from January 2006 to June 2021 (excluding bioenergy). The studies were analysed for compliance with the ISO 14044 standard, with specific reference to the goal, commissioning perspective, system boundary, function and functional unit, impact methods and categories. Results and discussions It was found that more than 85% of the studies reviewed failed to present the required goal statement and a description of the function of the system. Nearly 13% of the studies did not define the system boundary, and only 17% included a full life cycle including raw material extraction, production, use and end-of-life stages. The majority of the LCA studies surveyed from 2006 to 2021 were either (i) not in compliance with the ISO standards or (ii) space and style limitations of the publication process prevented competent practitioners from properly conveying their work. This suggests that the value and integrity of the literature are undermined by not rigorously addressing the first and most important stage of an LCA study. Conclusion When interpreting the results, a major shortcoming noted was that most studies did not consider the industrial symbiosis needed between feedstock, technology, primary products, side streams, downstream valorisation and long-term circularity in order to properly understand the transition pathways required. Bioeconomy technologies were imagined as displacers for feedstocks and processes to adapt business as usual, rather than as transformers of the system to a sustainable footing. Recommendation If LCA studies are going to provide meaningful information for actors and stakeholders to assess whether a system will be able to operate sustainably, studies should include a full, integrated system, standards should be adhered to and approaches should perhaps go beyond mere eco-efficiency, or doing less harm, as these are not necessarily indicative of sustainability. Historical bioeconomy LCA studies do not provide great insight into the transition to sustainable bioeconomy.Keywords
Funding Information
- Science Foundation Ireland (16/RC/3889)
- University College Dublin
This publication has 122 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessmentsApplied Energy, 2013
- Bioresource utilisation by sustainable technologies in new value-added biorefinery concepts – two case studies from food and forest industryJournal of Cleaner Production, 2013
- Fifteen years of ISO 14040: a reviewJournal of Cleaner Production, 2013
- The Bioeconomy in Europe: An OverviewSustainability, 2013
- Life cycle assessment of energy generation from biogas—Attributional vs. consequential approachRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012
- Systematic Review ChecklistJournal of Industrial Ecology, 2012
- An evaluation of life cycle assessment of European milk productionJournal of Environmental Management, 2011
- Accounting for Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part I: A Critical ReviewEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2010
- Positive and negative feedback in consequential life-cycle assessmentJournal of Cleaner Production, 2007
- Handbook on life cycle assessment — operational guide to the ISO standardsThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2001