Catalyst for change: Lessons learned from overcoming barriers to providing safe abortion care in Médecins Sans Frontières projects
Open Access
- 23 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Guttmacher Institute in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Vol. 56 (1), 60-71
- https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12209
Abstract
Context Despite instituting a policy in 2004, Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) continuously struggled to routinely provide safe abortion care (SAC). In 2016, the organization launched an initiative aimed at increasing availability of SAC in MSF projects and increasing understanding of abortion-related dynamics in humanitarian settings. Methodology From March 2017 to April 2018, MSF staff conducted support visits to 10 projects in a country in sub-Saharan Africa. Each visit followed a systematic approach with six key components and related tools that were later shared with teams worldwide. Data regarding women seeking abortion services and related outcomes were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Results From Q1 2017 through Q4 2019, SAC provision increased significantly in all 10 projects, rising from three to 759 safe abortions per quarter. Teams received 3831 patients seeking SAC and provided 3640 first and second trimester abortions, over 99% via medication methods. The overall complication rate was 4.29% and 0.3% for severe, life-threatening complications. No major security incidents were reported. MSF provision of SAC worldwide increased from 781 in 2016 (the year before this initiative began) to 21,546 in 2019. Conclusion Implementation of SAC in humanitarian settings-even those with significant legal restrictions-is possible and necessary. Both first and second trimester medication abortion can be safely and effectively provided through both home- and facility-based models of care. Programmatic data provide valuable insights into abortion-related dynamics which must shape operational decision-making. Addressing internal barriers and providing direct field support were key to stimulating organizational cultural change.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Commentary: No-test medication abortion: A sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyondContraception, 2020
- Values clarification workshops to improve abortion knowledge, attitudes and intentions: a pre-post assessment in 12 countriesReproductive Health, 2018
- Community-based distribution of misoprostol for early abortion: evaluation of a program along the Thailand–Burma borderContraception, 2017
- Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone followed by unlimited dosing of buccal misoprostol in ArmeniaThe European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 2016
- Why don’t humanitarian organizations provide safe abortion services?Conflict and Health, 2016
- Facility‐based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countriesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2015
- Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: mixed-methods case studiesConflict and Health, 2015
- Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysisThe Lancet. Global Health, 2014
- Delay in termination of pregnancy among unmarried adolescents and young women attending a tertiary hospital abortion clinic in Trivandrum, Kerala, IndiaReproductive Health Matters, 2013
- Confronting the challenge of unsafe second‐trimester abortionInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2011