A structured literature review of the meat paradox
Open Access
- 23 September 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) in Social Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 16 (3), 1-26
- https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.5953
Abstract
Many people wish to avoid harming animals, yet most people also consume meat. This theoretical ‘meat paradox’ is a form of cognitive dissonance and has grave negative consequences for animal welfare and the environment. Yet, despite these consequences, the meat paradox literature is sparse. The current structured literature review (SLR) explores primary literature up to May 2020, supporting the paradox and uniquely reviewing all known triggers of the paradox (e.g., exposure to meat’s animal origins), all known strategies to overcome the paradox (e.g., avoiding thinking about consumed animals) and how different people (e.g., those of different genders, occupations, ages, dietary preferences, cultures or religions) utilise varying strategies to overcome the paradox. For instance, the review uniquely demonstrates how dietary identity, dietary adherence and meat consumption frequency, among other demographic and psychographic factors, all affect moral (dis)engagement from animals. Overall, this paper has wide-ranging theoretical implications for the meat paradox and social psychological literature, and practical implications for meat reduction policies.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Situating moral disengagement: Motivated reasoning in meat consumption and substitutionPersonality and Individual Differences, 2016
- Eating like there's no tomorrow: Public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable dietAppetite, 2016
- Confronting the meat paradox in different cultural contexts: Reactions among Chinese and French participantsAppetite, 2016
- Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4NsAppetite, 2015
- Meat, beyond the plate. Data-driven hypotheses for understanding consumer willingness to adopt a more plant-based dietAppetite, 2015
- Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eatersAppetite, 2014
- Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption.Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 2013
- Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human ConsumptionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2011
- The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivoresEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2011
- The Motivational Bases of Attitudes Toward AnimalsSociety & Animals, 1993