Testing the Fidelity of Simulations of Black Hole–Galaxy Coevolution at z ∼ 1.5 with Observations
- 1 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 896 (2), 159
- https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab91be
Abstract
We examine the scaling relations between the mass of a supermassive black hole (SMBH) and its host galaxy properties at 1.2 < z < 1.7 using both observational data and simulations. Recent measurements of 32 X-ray-selected, broad-line active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are compared with two independent state-of-the-art efforts, including the hydrodynamic simulation MassiveBlackII (MBII) and a semianalytic model (SAM). After applying an observational selection function to the simulations, we find that both MBII and SAM agree well with the data, in terms of the central distribution. However, the dispersion in the mass ratio between black hole mass and stellar mass is significantly more consistent with the MBII prediction (similar to 0.3 dex) than with the SAM (similar to 0.7 dex), even when accounting for observational uncertainties. Hence, our observations can distinguish between the different recipes adopted in the models. The mass relations in the MBII are highly dependent on AGN feedback, while the relations in the SAM are more sensitive to galaxy-merger events triggering nuclear activity. Moreover, the intrinsic scatter in the mass ratio of our high-z sample is comparable with that observed in the local sample, all but ruling out the proposed scenario that the correlations are purely stochastic in nature arising from some sort of cosmic central limit theorem. Our results support the hypothesis of AGN feedback being responsible for a causal link between the SMBH and its host galaxy, resulting in a tight correlation between their respective masses.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host GalaxiesAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2013
- THE IMPACT OF GALAXY INTERACTIONS ON ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS ACTIVITY IN zCOSMOSThe Astrophysical Journal, 2011
- THE RELATION BETWEEN BLACK HOLE MASS AND HOST SPHEROID STELLAR MASS OUT TOz∼ 2The Astrophysical Journal, 2011
- SEVEN-YEARWILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATIONThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2011
- The Blast Wave Model for AGN Feedback: Effects on AGN ObscurationThe Astrophysical Journal, 2008
- Selection Bias in Observing the Cosmological Evolution of theM•‐σ andM•‐LRelationshipsThe Astrophysical Journal, 2007
- Cosmic Evolution of Black Holes and Spheroids. II. Scaling Relations atz = 0.36The Astrophysical Journal, 2007
- The Relation between Black Hole Mass, Bulge Mass, and Near-Infrared LuminosityThe Astrophysical Journal, 2003
- A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host GalaxiesThe Astrophysical Journal, 2000
- The formation of galactic discsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1998