Reproductive coercion and abuse among pregnancy counselling clients in Australia: trends and directions
Open Access
- 30 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Reproductive Health
- Vol. 19 (1), 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01479-7
Abstract
Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) interferes with a person’s reproductive autonomy and can be classified into behaviours that are pregnancy promoting or pregnancy preventing (including coerced abortion). However, prevalence data are lacking, and little is known about whether particular forms of RCA are more or less common. The aims of our study were to explore how frequently people seeking pregnancy counselling reported RCA, the proportions reporting the different forms of RCA, and whether there were different trends based on a range of demographic factors. Data were collected from 5107 clients seeking counselling support for their pregnancy between January 2018 and December 2020 from two leading providers of pregnancy counselling and sexual and reproductive health services in Australia, Marie Stopes Australia and Children by Choice. Counsellors identified and recorded the presence of RCA and whether the behaviour was pregnancy promoting and/or pregnancy preventing. Demographic factors included age, and whether the person identified as being from a migrant or refugee community or as an Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person. RCA was identified in 15.4% of clients, with similar proportions disclosing RCA towards pregnancy (6%) and towards pregnancy prevention or abortion (7.5%), and 1.9% experiencing RCA towards pregnancy and abortion concurrently. There were no differences based on age or whether the person identified as being from a migrant or refugee background, though people who identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander experienced RCA that was significantly more likely to be pregnancy promoting. RCA is commonly disclosed by people seeking support in a pregnancy counselling context, and coercion and abuse is equally likely to be towards pregnancy promotion or pregnancy prevention/abortion. Given the prevalence and negative impacts of RCA, regardless of age and background, we recommend sensitive and culturally respectful enquiry around experiences of RCA be embedded in healthcare, health education, and health research.Funding Information
- Griffith University
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Prevalence of Sexual Revictimization: A Meta-Analytic ReviewTrauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2017
- Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic ReviewTrauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2016
- Intimate Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion: Global Barriers to Women's Reproductive ControlPLoS Medicine, 2014
- Impact of monozygotic twinning on multiple births resulting from in vitro fertilization in the United States, 2006–2010American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2014
- Development and Validation of a Reproductive Autonomy ScaleStudies in Family Planning, 2014
- Reproductive coercion and co-occurring intimate partner violence in obstetrics and gynecology patientsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2014
- Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clientsContraception, 2013
- Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancyContraception, 2010
- Birth Control Sabotage and Forced Sex: Experiences Reported by Women in Domestic Violence SheltersViolence Against Women, 2010
- Power over parity: intimate partner violence and issues of fertility controlAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009