Prevention of Cardioembolic Complications in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Efficacy and Safety of Left Atrial Appendage Isolation and Oral Anticoagulants
Open Access
- 8 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Silicea - Poligraf in Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology
- Vol. 18 (4), 439-448
- https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2022-08-09
Abstract
Aim. To study the outcomes frequency and structure in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) depending on the cardioembolic events preventing method: left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin. Material and methods. A prospective observational study included patients with AF and high risk of cardioembolic complications and without contraindications to anticoagulants. Patients who refused long-term oral anticoagulants taking underwent LAA isolation, the rest of the patients received DOACs or warfarin. The observation period was 3 years. Mortality, cardioembolic complications and major bleeding (according to GARFIELD criteria) cumulative incidence was assessed. Results. We included 245 patients: 46 patients were treated with LAA isolation, 100 with warfarin, and 99 with DOACs. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant advantage of LAA occluder in terms of combined endpoint achieving frequency compared to warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] 3.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-9.54; p=0.049), and to DOACs (HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.15-10.29; p=0.027). A similar result was obtained for all-cause mortality (HR 5.24; 95% CI 1.12-24.55; p=0.036 and HR 5.58; 95% CI 1.22-25.49; p=0.027, respectively). There were no significant differences in bleeding rates between the groups. Conclusion. This observational study demonstrates the superiority of LAA isolation as a first-line therapy over DOACs and warfarin in patients with AF and high risk of cardioembolic complications. Randomized trials are required to confirm these observations.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implant success and safety of left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device: peri-procedural outcomes from the EWOLUTION registryEuropean Heart Journal, 2016
- Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs Warfarin for Atrial FibrillationJAMA, 2014
- Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long-Term Warfarin TherapyJournal of Invasive Cardiology, 2014
- Edoxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial FibrillationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial FibrillationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial FibrillationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial FibrillationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trialThe Lancet, 2009
- Thoracoscopic obliteration of the left atrial appendage: Potential for stroke reduction?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study.Stroke, 1991