Investors’ expectation on rate of return and moral image of companies
Open Access
- 1 November 2017
- journal article
- Published by Virtus Interpress in Corporate Ownership and Control
- Vol. 15 (2), 99-115
- https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i2art9
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become a fad in different industries, especially the finance industry. It is time to explore the relationship between images of companies and investors’ attitude. The purpose of this paper is to reflect the relationship between moral and immoral images of companies in relation to investors’ expectations on the rate of return of companies. Newspaper cuttings and fact sheets of selected companies were provided to participants to study their perception on the moral/immoral images of companies and investment attitude with questionnaires verified participants’ involvement in reading materials provided. Quantitative analysis of the questionnaires showed that an immoral premium was found in the expected returns of the participants. After the investment attitudes were induced on the participants, the participants gave a higher expected return on the company with a poor moral image (M=0.91, SD=1.05) than a company with a good moral image (M=0.46, SD=0.44). Immoral premium found in the expected returns for both before and after the time that the investment attitudes were induced to the participants. This research is managerially and strategically relevant and topical about the suggestion of immoral premium. However, longitudinal and qualitative analysis from the finance and social perspectives are required to support findings of this studyKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Socially Responsible Investment Policies Add or Destroy European Stock Portfolio Value?Journal of Business Ethics, 2014
- Are Investors Willing to Sacrifice Cash for Morality?Journal of Business Ethics, 2012
- Mutual Fund Attributes and Investor BehaviorJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2007
- The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate: New Evidence from CanadaJournal of Business Ethics, 2006
- Do Socially Responsible Fund Managers Really Invest Differently?Journal of Business Ethics, 2006
- Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalty?Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2006
- International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment styleJournal of Banking & Finance, 2005
- SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTING AND PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATIONJournal of Financial Research, 2005
- The ethical investor: Exploring dimensions of investment behaviourJournal of Economic Psychology, 1993
- A Theory of Social Custom, of Which Unemployment May be One ConsequenceThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980