The pitfalls of negative evidence
Open Access
- 5 July 2022
- journal article
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company in Language and Linguistics
- Vol. 18 (4), 577-621
- https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.18.4.02blu
Abstract
Beginning with publications in the early 1980s there have been attempts to use syntactic data to determine the highest-order subgroups of Austronesian. These efforts fall into two categories: those which claim that the voice affixes of Philippine-type languages originally had exclusively nominalizing functions, and those which claim that the affixes themselves were innovated after the separation of Rukai from the ancestor of all other Austronesian languages. Although these ideas lay dormant for some years, recently both have been revived in renewed efforts to show that the Austronesian family tree is not ‘rake-like’ in its highest nodes, but shows extensive embedding of subgroups that can be justified by successive layers of syntactic innovations. This paper questions the methodological soundness of both types of arguments on the grounds that they appeal to negative evidence, and logically any such appeal can do no better than reach an inference of indeterminate status rather than the positive conclusions that have been proposed.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reassessing the Position of Kanakanavu and Saaroa among the Formosan LanguagesOceanic Linguistics, 2016
- The Noun-Verb Distinction in Kanakanavu and Saaroa: Evidence from PronounsOceanic Linguistics, 2016
- Ergativity from Subjunctive in Austronesian LanguagesLanguage and Linguistics, 2016
- The Position of Enggano within AustronesianOceanic Linguistics, 2015
- In Defense of the Numeral-based Model of Austronesian Phylogeny, and of TsouicLanguage and Linguistics, 2014
- Is Puyuma a Primary Branch of Austronesian?: A RejoinderOceanic Linguistics, 2013
- The Checkered Prehistory of Rice Movement Southwards as a Domesticated Cereal—from the Yangzi to the EquatorRice, 2011
- Is Puyuma a Primary Branch of Austronesian?: A Reply to SagartOceanic Linguistics, 2010
- An Integrated Perspective On The Austronesian Diaspora: The Switch from Cereal Agriculture to Maritime Foraging in the Colonisation of Island Southeast AsiaAustralian Archaeology, 2008
- Homomeric lexical classificationPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1990