Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts
- 25 July 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Academic Radiology
- Vol. 24 (12), 1561-1569
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.06.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (BC100474)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Changes in BI-RADS Density Assessment Guidelines (Fourth Versus Fifth Edition) on Breast Density Assessment: Intra- and Interreader Agreements and Density DistributionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2016
- Mammographic Density Estimation with Automated Volumetric Breast Density MeasurementKorean Journal of Radiology, 2014
- Reported Mammographic Density: Film-Screen versus Digital AcquisitionRadiology, 2013
- Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Community Practice in the United StatesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Accuracy of Assigned BI-RADS Breast Density Category DefinitionsAcademic Radiology, 2006
- Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer RiskRadiology, 2004
- Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening MammographyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms.RadioGraphics, 1998
- Mammographic Features and Breast Cancer Risk: Effects With Time, Age, and Menopause StatusJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1995