Contextualizing the think crisis-think female stereotype in explaining the glass cliff: Gendered traits, gender, and type of crisis
Open Access
- 2 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 16 (3), e0246576
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246576
Abstract
The glass cliff suggests that women are more likely to access leadership positions when organizations are facing a crisis. Although this phenomenon is well established, it is still largely unknown how variations in types of crises influence the strength of the think crisis-think female association, and whether female leaders and leaders with communal gendered traits are both affected by this association. We hypothesized that selection of stereotypically feminine traits (communal leaders) is specific to a relational crisis because of a fit between leader traits and traits required by the situation. We further expected that the selection of women also extends to other crisis situations because other factors such as their signaling change potential may play a role. We investigated the associations that participants made with candidates who varied across gendered traits and gender and between two crisis situations involving problems with either stereotypically feminine (e.g., an internal disharmony) or masculine (e.g., a financial problem) components, and a no crisis situation control. Results from three experimental studies (Ns = 319, 384, 385) supported our hypotheses by showing that communal leaders were most strongly associated with a relational crisis and least with a financial crisis, with the no crisis context situated in-between. This pattern was explained by higher relevance ratings for communal leadership behavior in the relational crisis versus financial crisis context, with the no crisis context situated in-between. In contrast, female leaders were most strongly associated with the relational crisis and least with the no crisis context, with the financial crisis situated in-between. Specific explanatory mechanisms related to the female-crisis association are explored and discussed. Our findings suggest that implicit motivations for valuing feminine/communal leadership and atypical leaders in crisis situations need further research.Keywords
Funding Information
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (100019_188934)
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does valuing androgyny and femininity lead to a female advantage? The relationship between gender-role, transformational leadership and identificationThe Leadership Quarterly, 2012
- The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contextsBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2010
- Perceived Dissimilarity and Perspective Taking Within Work TeamsGroup & Organization Management, 2007
- Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication TheoryCorporate Reputation Review, 2007
- Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from SpainIndustrial Marketing Management, 2007
- The Glass Cliff: Exploring the Dynamics Surrounding the Appointment of Women to Precarious Leadership PositionsAcademy of Management Review, 2007
- The Mutiny Wagon Wheel: A Leadership Model for Mutiny in CombatArmed Forces & Society, 2002
- Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 1989
- An Organization in Crisis and Non-crisis SituationsHuman Relations, 1971
- Threat, Attraction to Group, and Need for Strong LeadershipHuman Relations, 1963