What Does Course Design Mean to College Science and Mathematics Teachers?
- 1 March 2019
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of College Science Teaching
- Vol. 48 (4), 81-91
- https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst19_048_04_81
Abstract
The study shows that instructors, administrators, and faculty developers should view course design not only as a variety of individual approaches, but also as opportunities to stimulate networks to enhance the design process and its impact.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bridging the educational research‐teaching practice gapBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2008
- Constraints on academics’ potential for developing as a teacherStudies in Higher Education, 2007
- Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ workInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2007
- The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it?Studies in Higher Education, 2006
- Confirmatory factor analysis of the Approaches to Teaching InventoryBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 2006
- Introduction to faculty learning communitiesNew Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004
- Scholarship of Teaching: A modelHigher Education Research & Development, 2000
- Action Research into the Quality of Student Learning: A Paradigm for Faculty DevelopmentThe Journal of Higher Education, 1996
- Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university scienceHigher Education, 1994
- ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS*British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976